• Users Online: 291
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 99-104

Foam sclerotherapy for below knee varicosities after great saphenous ligation and stripping: Comparison of multiple injections with infusion


1 Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Haizhu, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
2 Zhongshan School of Medicine; Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Haizhu, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
3 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Haizhu, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kai Huang
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 33, Yingfeng Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510 000, Guangdong Province
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2589-9686.328157

Rights and Permissions

AIMS: This study aimed to compare the short-term clinical results of multiple foam sclerosant injection (MFSI) and endovenous foam sclerosant perfusion (EFSP) for treating varicose veins (VV) in the lower extremities through. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 111 cases. All patients had high saphenous ligation and stripping just before the foam injection. First-stage sclerotherapy effects, sclerosant dosage, postoperative complications, and other clinical assessments were included as observation items with at least 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The treatment effects of the 2 VV treatment methods showed no significant difference (P < 0.05) during primary closure. However, EFSP requires a lower sclerosant dosage, resulting in a lower occurrence of thrombophlebitis than that with MFSI (P < 0.05). In the follow-up period, no significant difference in recurrence rate was found between the groups (P > 0.05). Although superficial thrombophlebitis and pigmentation occurred in both groups, the EFSP group appeared to be more prone to remission (P < 0.05), as there were no vein-puncture injuries or factors to cause local hematoma. Superficial thrombophlebitis and skin pigmentation were less in the EFSP than the MSFI group (4.4% vs. 16%; P = 0.033 and 8.8% vs. 30.2%; P = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both MFSI and EPSP visibly affect VV in the lower extremities, but when complications and the simplicity and reproducibility of operation techniques are considered, EFSP appears more worthy of promotion.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed773    
    Printed33    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded73    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal